The Efficiency Paradox: Why Enterprises are Getting Less Value From Agents as They Add More

Halfway into 2025, more than 85% of funding in the agentic AI space has gone to foundational model providers (OpenAI, xAI, Anthropic, Mistral) and infrastructure companies (Together AI, Lambda, TensorWave, Celestial AI) [read full executive report here]. These players provide the compute, models, and platforms everyone else will build on.

For enterprise AI leaders, the signal is clear: models and infrastructure are racing toward commoditization. The real opportunity is not in raw AI capability or efficiency but in what makes that efficiency scale.

This is where most organizations get it wrong. They assume that adding more agents simply multiplies the exponential speed of one. In reality, scaling agents is not a straight line to greater efficiency. One agent feels transformative. Ten uncoordinated agents create friction, duplication, and noise.

The same is true for humans: efficiency does not scale on its own. Human productivity only became scalable once we learned how to evolve as groups by forming teams, building institutions, and sharing knowledge. 

While today’s agents deliver value, they remain largely siloed and uncoordinated. That is the missing capability: enabling agents to evolve as a group. The leap forward comes when agents start operating as a workforce with evolving roles, coordinated tasks, and collective momentum.

Why the agent workforce isn’t scaling today

For humans, the breakthrough came when intelligence became collective. Teams, institutions, and enterprises gave individuals the scaffolding to build on each other’s work, coordinate roles, and carry knowledge forward.

Agents don’t have that scaffolding today. Agents are fast, efficient, and increasingly collaborative, but they don’t evolve as a group. To get there, enterprises must provide the same five pillars of Human Workforce Management that made human productivity scalable:

1. Learning & Development: Records and training systems that enable personal learning and group learning. 
2. Performance Management: Clear goals and evaluation frameworks that align effort with outcomes.
3. Organizational Design: Explicit roles and coordination protocols that prevent duplication and conflict.
4. Tools & Systems: Controlled access to resources so effort is productive, cost-effective, and safe.
5. Strategic planning: Long-term goal setting, workforce planning, and resource allocation to ensure teams can meet future objectives.

These requirements have been applied to humans through workforce management, but AI introduces dynamics that human frameworks can’t handle.

1. Learning & Development

Human precedent: Writing and documentation (e.g., Confluence, Notion) created durable knowledge that teams could build on, supported by onboarding and training systems that helped employees learn independently and as a group. 

AI requirement: Research on multi-agent systems shows that without a shared memory, agents quickly diverge, producing inconsistent narratives and duplicating work. To scale as a collective, agents need a continuously evolving memory layer that persists across tasks and lifecycles, synchronizes what every agent knows in real time, and feeds insights back into retraining pipelines.

2. Performance Management

Human precedent: Enterprises manage performance through goal-setting, KPIs, and feedback cycles that create accountability and alignment with cultural values. Employees know what is expected and how success will be evaluated.

AI requirement: Agents will flag ambiguities and request clarification, but if built on human frameworks, their machine-speed execution is constrained by quarterly OKRs, static KPIs, and manual oversight. To scale as a group, agents need clear, machine-readable objectives and real-time performance tracking that continuously measures outcomes and updates both individual behavior and system-wide coordination. 

3. Organizational Design

Human precedent: Org charts, job descriptions, and managerial layers clarify ownership, reduce duplication, and structure collaboration. When roles blur, managers step in to resolve.

AI requirement: Agents can scale horizontally but are often deployed like isolated workers in fixed roles which limits their collective efficiency. They need dynamic routing and orchestration layers that assign tasks in real time based on skill, availability, and performance. By adding escalation protocols between agents, the system can prevent loops and bottlenecks while continuously refining workflows, allowing the entire agent network to become more efficient over time. 

4. Tools & Systems

Human precedent: Employees are equipped with software, data, and resources provisioned by IT and constrained by budgets, access controls, and compliance. These systems ensure that work can happen safely, efficiently, and within cost.

AI requirement: Left unchecked, agents can overspend on compute, over-query APIs, or expose sensitive data. Research on open-ended agent environments shows that without constraints, agents often pursue irrelevant actions and over-consume resources. To keep AI agents safe and cost-effective, organizations need systems that control which resources agents can use, when they can use them, and whether the value of the task justifies the spend.

5. Strategic Planning

Human precedent: Leadership teams set long-term goals, forecast needs, and allocate resources. Strategic planning involves identifying capability gaps, hiring talent, and reorganizing teams to ensure the business can meet future objectives. 

AI requirement: In an agent ecosystem, strategy shifts from periodic reviews to a continuous, adaptive process. The system identifies emerging capability gaps, reorganizes workflows, and creates or fine-tunes new agents to close them. Agents can also be reallocated or retired as needs evolve, allowing the network to function like a living organization that adapts in real time. 

What it takes for the agent workforce to scale

These five requirements are not new. Enterprises already solved them once through Human Workforce Management. But these frameworks were built for human characteristics, optimized to human speed. That means the same foundations must be reimagined for agents. 

This is what we call Agent Workforce Management: the discipline of managing agents as an evolving workforce.

What Wand is building

To scale an AI workforce, we must solve for agents the same challenges we once solved for humans. At Wand we call it the Wand Artificial Workforce Technology. This technology enables the creation, execution, orchestration, coordination, evolution and management of AI agents.

The core of our technology is built on four pillars:

• Agent Government: rules, priorities, and escalation that align agents with business objectives.
• Agent Network: protocols for collaboration, routing, and benchmarking across agents.
• Agent University: infrastructure for continuous learning, retraining, role evolution, and the creation of new agents from scratch to meet emerging needs.
• Agent Economy: systems for allocating tools, data, and compute based on value.

Together, these four pillars give enterprises the foundation to manage agents as a workforce: aligned, accountable, and evolving together.

Because of this design, the system does far more than plug agents into existing workflows. Agent Government aligns them with business objectives; Agent Network ensures they collaborate effectively; Agent University adapts and retrains them as needs change; and Agent Economy allocates resources to maximize their impact.

In practice, this means the system can identify gaps, create and assign new agent roles, monitor and adapt performance, and drive continuous improvement. In essence, the system transforms the workforce in lockstep with organizational needs. Ultimately, this turns agents from isolated tools into an evolving workforce, enabling organizations to operate at a scale and speed no human workforce could ever achieve. 

For enterprises, adopting this capability is less about keeping pace with technology and more about preparing for how work itself is changing. The shift is already underway. 

If you’re interested in seeing how Wand can work inside your organization, book a demo.

Book a Demo